<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The high bar for relevancy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/10/04/the-high-bar-for-relevancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/10/04/the-high-bar-for-relevancy/</link>
	<description>Exclusively dedicated to Apache Lucene/Solr open source search technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Underwood</title>
		<link>http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/10/04/the-high-bar-for-relevancy/comment-page-1/#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Underwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/?p=1205#comment-3834</guid>
		<description>Netflix may be an extreme case of known-item search, where people are always looking for the title (or a person) instead of a class of things. In addition, the studios spend millions of dollars teaching those titles (the search terms) to people. That doesn&#039;t mean that people can spell &quot;Ratatouille&quot; or &quot;Coraline&quot;, but it helps.

At a site selling cordless drills or fleece jackets, I seriously doubt you would get 85% of clicks on the first result. That would be dominated by informational searches, not known-item, known-title searches.

If your site deals with mass-market artistic works (books, film, music), the searches might look more like Netflix&#039;s.

Thanks for the writeup, it was a fun meetup with lots of good presentations. The Babbage engine is amazing, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix may be an extreme case of known-item search, where people are always looking for the title (or a person) instead of a class of things. In addition, the studios spend millions of dollars teaching those titles (the search terms) to people. That doesn&#8217;t mean that people can spell &#8220;Ratatouille&#8221; or &#8220;Coraline&#8221;, but it helps.</p>
<p>At a site selling cordless drills or fleece jackets, I seriously doubt you would get 85% of clicks on the first result. That would be dominated by informational searches, not known-item, known-title searches.</p>
<p>If your site deals with mass-market artistic works (books, film, music), the searches might look more like Netflix&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Thanks for the writeup, it was a fun meetup with lots of good presentations. The Babbage engine is amazing, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

