<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucene makes Google Yelp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/12/18/lucene-makes-google-yelp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/12/18/lucene-makes-google-yelp/</link>
	<description>Exclusively dedicated to Apache Lucene/Solr open source search technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smiley</title>
		<link>http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/12/18/lucene-makes-google-yelp/comment-page-1/#comment-4254</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/?p=1423#comment-4254</guid>
		<description>Cute headline but it&#039;s the reverse that is more true.  Lucene isn&#039;t making Google [acquire] Yelp (obviously), instead Yelp&#039;s use of Lucene would make Google use it.  But then probably not longterm -- I&#039;d bet they will switch to their own search infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute headline but it&#8217;s the reverse that is more true.  Lucene isn&#8217;t making Google [acquire] Yelp (obviously), instead Yelp&#8217;s use of Lucene would make Google use it.  But then probably not longterm &#8212; I&#8217;d bet they will switch to their own search infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

