Found 90,988 results in 0.229 seconds. Displaying page 1 of 9,099, sorted by
Sent 2010-03-15 by Marvin Humphrey <marvin@...>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:28:33AM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I mean specifically one should not have to commit to the precise
> scoring model they will use for a given field, when they index that
> field.
Yeah, I've never seen committing to a precise scoring model at index-time via
Sim ...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Steven A Rowe <sarowe@...>
Hi Rene,
Have you seen SpanNotQuery?:
For a document that looks like:
T1 T2 T3
T4 T5 T6
Sent 2010-03-15 by Erick Erickson <erickerickson@...>
Not quite what I had in mind, more like
level1-1/level2-1/level3-1/Term1 level1-1/level2-1/level3-1/Term2
level1-1/level2-1/level3-2/Term3 level1-1/level2-1/level3-2/Term4
With an increment gap 0f 100 and an analyzer that split on slashes, the term
positions would be
something like:
term term...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@...>
>
> Personally I'd prefer we just stop adding them, and the current ones work
> their way up like normal if they are so inclined, or the ones that are not
> even around anymore can just stay as they are.
>
This seems reasonable to me.
------------------------------------------------------------...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Rene Hackl-Sommer <rene.a.hackl@...>
Hi Erick,
> What about indexing
> the triplets with a small increment gap between? That is:
> ...
> gets indexed as:
>
> level1-1/level2-1/level3-1 +gap 100
> level1-1/level2-1/level3-2 +gap 100
> level1-1/level2-2/level3-3 +gap 100
> level1-1/level2-2/level3-4
>
If I understand this corr...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Rene Hackl-Sommer <rene.a.hackl@...>
Hi Steve,
> Why can't you use a different field for each of the Level_X's, i.e. MyLevel1Field, MyLevel2Field, MyLevel3Field?
>
Well, the hierarchical structure needs to be maintained. As hundreds of
Level_X entities can be found on levels 2 and 3, I need to be able to
tell for instance wh...
Sent 2010-03-15 by DM Smith <dmsmith555@...>
My 2 cents as one who has no aspirations of ever being a committer.
I think with the pending re-org of contrib and the value of contrib, it
doesn't make much sense to have the distinction between core and contrib
let alone for contributors.
Regarding the former low bar, either prune the list ...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@...>
On Mar 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/15/2010 08:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Right, Mark. I think we would be effectively raising the bar to some extent for what it takes to be a committer.
>
> That's part of my point though - some are contrib committers with a lower bar...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Mark Miller <markrmiller@...>
On 03/15/2010 08:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Right, Mark. I think we would be effectively raising the bar to some extent for what it takes to be a committer.
That's part of my point though - some are contrib committers with a
lower bar - now they are core/solr committers with that lower ba...
Sent 2010-03-15 by Erick Erickson <erickerickson@...>
What's a document? What's indexing?
Here's what I'd do as a very first step. Time the actual
indexing and report it out. By that I mean how long does
IndexWriter.addDocument() take? If you actually get the
document from wherever first then add all the fields
and add the document, I'd time adding...
